mirror of
https://github.com/freeCodeCamp/freeCodeCamp.git
synced 2026-05-28 18:26:54 +00:00
chore(i18n,docs): processed translations (#51672)
This commit is contained in:
camperbot
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ npx playwright show-report
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Troubleshooting
|
||||
|
||||
Playwright is generally a solid bullet-proof tool. The contributor has already configured the tests to run on all OS machines, including majpr distributions of Windows, MacOS and Linux.
|
||||
Playwright is generally a solid bullet-proof tool. The contributor has already configured the tests to run on all OS machines, including major distributions of Windows, MacOS and Linux.
|
||||
|
||||
- (MacOs and Linux) If running Playwright results in an error due to kernel dependencies, run the following command:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ All moderator actions can be followed by reviewing the [action logs](https://for
|
||||
|
||||
For the first week or so you will want to pay attention to what is getting flagged and what is being reviewed, and compare that to the actions being taken upon the flagged posts. You may see the system account flag a post because the user created it too quickly. In many cases, the moderators will unflag the post by clicking on the "Approve Post" button or mark it as "Not Spam" (depending on the flag type).
|
||||
|
||||
Commonly, spam flags can also be raised by members or moderators. Common duplicitous behaviour would involve opening an account, making a post that seems harmless, then editing that post later on to add a link to an external site for the purpose of advertising it. In this case, usually the member account is fairly new and has only made this one post thus far, which indicates that the account was opened for the sole purpose of spamming the community. The decision should be made to delete the account after the first offence in this case. The same applies for accounts whose first post is deemed to be spam.
|
||||
Commonly, spam flags can also be raised by members or moderators. Common duplicitous behavior would involve opening an account, making a post that seems harmless, then editing that post later on to add a link to an external site for the purpose of advertising it. In this case, usually the member account is fairly new and has only made this one post thus far, which indicates that the account was opened for the sole purpose of spamming the community. The decision should be made to delete the account after the first offence in this case. The same applies for accounts whose first post is deemed to be spam.
|
||||
|
||||
You may notice moderators performing a procedure called 'split topic'. This may be a case where a moderator has split a post that was made erroneously on an existing topic into a new topic, or a moderator merged duplicate topics that a single user has created for the same question. Watching this procedure will highlight different actions and their causes.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ npx playwright show-report
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Troubleshooting
|
||||
|
||||
Playwright is generally a solid bullet-proof tool. The contributor has already configured the tests to run on all OS machines, including majpr distributions of Windows, MacOS and Linux.
|
||||
Playwright is generally a solid bullet-proof tool. The contributor has already configured the tests to run on all OS machines, including major distributions of Windows, MacOS and Linux.
|
||||
|
||||
- (MacOs and Linux) If running Playwright results in an error due to kernel dependencies, run the following command:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ All moderator actions can be followed by reviewing the [action logs](https://for
|
||||
|
||||
For the first week or so you will want to pay attention to what is getting flagged and what is being reviewed, and compare that to the actions being taken upon the flagged posts. You may see the system account flag a post because the user created it too quickly. In many cases, the moderators will unflag the post by clicking on the "Approve Post" button or mark it as "Not Spam" (depending on the flag type).
|
||||
|
||||
Commonly, spam flags can also be raised by members or moderators. Common duplicitous behaviour would involve opening an account, making a post that seems harmless, then editing that post later on to add a link to an external site for the purpose of advertising it. In this case, usually the member account is fairly new and has only made this one post thus far, which indicates that the account was opened for the sole purpose of spamming the community. The decision should be made to delete the account after the first offence in this case. The same applies for accounts whose first post is deemed to be spam.
|
||||
Commonly, spam flags can also be raised by members or moderators. Common duplicitous behavior would involve opening an account, making a post that seems harmless, then editing that post later on to add a link to an external site for the purpose of advertising it. In this case, usually the member account is fairly new and has only made this one post thus far, which indicates that the account was opened for the sole purpose of spamming the community. The decision should be made to delete the account after the first offence in this case. The same applies for accounts whose first post is deemed to be spam.
|
||||
|
||||
You may notice moderators performing a procedure called 'split topic'. This may be a case where a moderator has split a post that was made erroneously on an existing topic into a new topic, or a moderator merged duplicate topics that a single user has created for the same question. Watching this procedure will highlight different actions and their causes.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ npx playwright show-report
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Troubleshooting
|
||||
|
||||
Playwright is generally a solid bullet-proof tool. The contributor has already configured the tests to run on all OS machines, including majpr distributions of Windows, MacOS and Linux.
|
||||
Playwright is generally a solid bullet-proof tool. The contributor has already configured the tests to run on all OS machines, including major distributions of Windows, MacOS and Linux.
|
||||
|
||||
- (MacOs and Linux) If running Playwright results in an error due to kernel dependencies, run the following command:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Todas las acciones del moderador se pueden seguir revisando los [registros de ac
|
||||
|
||||
For the first week or so you will want to pay attention to what is getting flagged and what is being reviewed, and compare that to the actions being taken upon the flagged posts. You may see the system account flag a post because the user created it too quickly. In many cases, the moderators will unflag the post by clicking on the "Approve Post" button or mark it as "Not Spam" (depending on the flag type).
|
||||
|
||||
Commonly, spam flags can also be raised by members or moderators. Common duplicitous behaviour would involve opening an account, making a post that seems harmless, then editing that post later on to add a link to an external site for the purpose of advertising it. In this case, usually the member account is fairly new and has only made this one post thus far, which indicates that the account was opened for the sole purpose of spamming the community. The decision should be made to delete the account after the first offence in this case. The same applies for accounts whose first post is deemed to be spam.
|
||||
Commonly, spam flags can also be raised by members or moderators. Common duplicitous behavior would involve opening an account, making a post that seems harmless, then editing that post later on to add a link to an external site for the purpose of advertising it. In this case, usually the member account is fairly new and has only made this one post thus far, which indicates that the account was opened for the sole purpose of spamming the community. The decision should be made to delete the account after the first offence in this case. The same applies for accounts whose first post is deemed to be spam.
|
||||
|
||||
You may notice moderators performing a procedure called 'split topic'. This may be a case where a moderator has split a post that was made erroneously on an existing topic into a new topic, or a moderator merged duplicate topics that a single user has created for the same question. Watching this procedure will highlight different actions and their causes.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ npx playwright show-report
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Troubleshooting
|
||||
|
||||
Playwright is generally a solid bullet-proof tool. The contributor has already configured the tests to run on all OS machines, including majpr distributions of Windows, MacOS and Linux.
|
||||
Playwright is generally a solid bullet-proof tool. The contributor has already configured the tests to run on all OS machines, including major distributions of Windows, MacOS and Linux.
|
||||
|
||||
- (MacOs and Linux) If running Playwright results in an error due to kernel dependencies, run the following command:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Alle Aktionen der Moderatoren können in den [Aktionsprotokollen](https://forum.
|
||||
|
||||
In der ersten Woche solltest du darauf achten, was markiert und was überprüft wird, und dies mit den Maßnahmen vergleichen, die aufgrund der markierten Beiträge ergriffen werden. Es kann vorkommen, dass das Systemkonto einen Beitrag markiert, weil der Benutzer ihn zu schnell erstellt hat. In vielen Fällen heben die Moderatoren die Markierung des Beitrags auf, indem sie auf die Schaltfläche "Approve Post" klicken oder ihn als "Not Spam" markieren (je nach Art der Markierung).
|
||||
|
||||
In der Regel können Spam-Markierungen auch von Mitgliedern oder Moderatoren gesetzt werden. Ein übliches betrügerisches Verhalten besteht darin, ein Konto zu eröffnen, einen scheinbar harmlosen Beitrag zu verfassen und diesen Beitrag später zu bearbeiten, um einen Link zu einer externen Website hinzuzufügen, um für diese zu werben. In diesem Fall ist das Mitgliedskonto in der Regel recht neu und hat bisher nur diesen einen Beitrag verfasst, was darauf hindeutet, dass das Konto nur zu dem Zweck eröffnet wurde, die Community zu spammen. In diesem Fall sollte die Entscheidung getroffen werden, das Konto nach dem ersten Verstoß zu löschen. Das Gleiche gilt für Konten, deren erster Beitrag als Spam eingestuft wird.
|
||||
In der Regel können Spam-Markierungen auch von Mitgliedern oder Moderatoren gesetzt werden. Common duplicitous behavior would involve opening an account, making a post that seems harmless, then editing that post later on to add a link to an external site for the purpose of advertising it. In diesem Fall ist das Mitgliedskonto in der Regel recht neu und hat bisher nur diesen einen Beitrag verfasst, was darauf hindeutet, dass das Konto nur zu dem Zweck eröffnet wurde, die Community zu spammen. In diesem Fall sollte die Entscheidung getroffen werden, das Konto nach dem ersten Verstoß zu löschen. Das Gleiche gilt für Konten, deren erster Beitrag als Spam eingestuft wird.
|
||||
|
||||
Vielleicht bemerkst du, dass die Moderatoren ein Verfahren namens "Split Topic" anwenden. Dies kann der Fall sein, wenn ein Moderator einen Beitrag, der fälschlicherweise in einem bestehenden Thema verfasst wurde, in ein neues Thema getrennt hat, oder wenn ein Moderator doppelte Themen zusammengeführt hat, die ein einzelner Benutzer für dieselbe Frage erstellt hat. Wenn du dir diesen Vorgang ansiehst, werden verschiedene Aktionen und ihre Ursachen deutlich.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ npx playwright show-report
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Troubleshooting
|
||||
|
||||
Playwright is generally a solid bullet-proof tool. The contributor has already configured the tests to run on all OS machines, including majpr distributions of Windows, MacOS and Linux.
|
||||
Playwright is generally a solid bullet-proof tool. The contributor has already configured the tests to run on all OS machines, including major distributions of Windows, MacOS and Linux.
|
||||
|
||||
- (MacOs and Linux) If running Playwright results in an error due to kernel dependencies, run the following command:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Tutte le azioni da moderatore possono essere seguite rivedendo gli [action log](
|
||||
|
||||
Per la prima settimana o giù di lì, presta attenzione a ciò che viene contrassegnato e ciò che è in fase di revisione, e confrontalo con le azioni intraprese sui post contrassegnati. Potresti vedere l'account di sistema contrassegnare un post perché l'utente lo ha creato troppo rapidamente. In molti casi, i moderatori cancelleranno il flag del post cliccando sul pulsante "Approve Post" o contrassegnandolo come "Not Spam" (a seconda del tipo di flag).
|
||||
|
||||
Comunemente, i flag di spam possono anche essere usati da membri o moderatori. Comportamenti sleali comuni comprendono creare un account, facendo un post che sembra innocuo, per poi modificarlo per aggiungere un link a un sito esterno a scopo di pubblicizzarlo. In questo caso, di solito l'account del membro è abbastanza nuovo e ha fatto questo solo post finora, il che indica che l'account è stato aperto al solo scopo di spamming. È opportuno decidere di cancellare l'account dopo la prima infrazione in questo caso. Lo stesso vale per gli account il cui primo post è considerato spam.
|
||||
Comunemente, i flag di spam possono anche essere usati da membri o moderatori. Common duplicitous behavior would involve opening an account, making a post that seems harmless, then editing that post later on to add a link to an external site for the purpose of advertising it. In questo caso, di solito l'account del membro è abbastanza nuovo e ha fatto questo solo post finora, il che indica che l'account è stato aperto al solo scopo di spamming. È opportuno decidere di cancellare l'account dopo la prima infrazione in questo caso. Lo stesso vale per gli account il cui primo post è considerato spam.
|
||||
|
||||
Puoi notare moderatori che eseguono una procedura chiamata 'split topic'. Questo può essere un caso in cui un moderatore ha smistato un post che è stato fatto erroneamente su un argomento esistente in un nuovo argomento, o un moderatore ha unito argomenti duplicati che un singolo utente ha creato per la stessa domanda. Guardare questa procedura metterà in evidenza le diverse azioni e le loro cause.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ npx playwright show-report
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Troubleshooting
|
||||
|
||||
Playwright is generally a solid bullet-proof tool. The contributor has already configured the tests to run on all OS machines, including majpr distributions of Windows, MacOS and Linux.
|
||||
Playwright is generally a solid bullet-proof tool. The contributor has already configured the tests to run on all OS machines, including major distributions of Windows, MacOS and Linux.
|
||||
|
||||
- (MacOs and Linux) If running Playwright results in an error due to kernel dependencies, run the following command:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ All moderator actions can be followed by reviewing the [action logs](https://for
|
||||
|
||||
For the first week or so you will want to pay attention to what is getting flagged and what is being reviewed, and compare that to the actions being taken upon the flagged posts. You may see the system account flag a post because the user created it too quickly. In many cases, the moderators will unflag the post by clicking on the "Approve Post" button or mark it as "Not Spam" (depending on the flag type).
|
||||
|
||||
Commonly, spam flags can also be raised by members or moderators. Common duplicitous behaviour would involve opening an account, making a post that seems harmless, then editing that post later on to add a link to an external site for the purpose of advertising it. In this case, usually the member account is fairly new and has only made this one post thus far, which indicates that the account was opened for the sole purpose of spamming the community. The decision should be made to delete the account after the first offence in this case. The same applies for accounts whose first post is deemed to be spam.
|
||||
Commonly, spam flags can also be raised by members or moderators. Common duplicitous behavior would involve opening an account, making a post that seems harmless, then editing that post later on to add a link to an external site for the purpose of advertising it. In this case, usually the member account is fairly new and has only made this one post thus far, which indicates that the account was opened for the sole purpose of spamming the community. The decision should be made to delete the account after the first offence in this case. The same applies for accounts whose first post is deemed to be spam.
|
||||
|
||||
You may notice moderators performing a procedure called 'split topic'. This may be a case where a moderator has split a post that was made erroneously on an existing topic into a new topic, or a moderator merged duplicate topics that a single user has created for the same question. Watching this procedure will highlight different actions and their causes.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ npx playwright show-report
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Solução de problemas
|
||||
|
||||
O Playwright, geralmente, é uma ferramenta com pouquíssimas chances de erro. O colaborador já configurou os testes para serem executados em máquinas com todos os sistemas operacionais, incluindo as distribuições mais significativas do Windows, MacOS e Linux.
|
||||
O Playwright, geralmente, é uma ferramenta com pouquíssimas chances de erro. The contributor has already configured the tests to run on all OS machines, including major distributions of Windows, MacOS and Linux.
|
||||
|
||||
- (MacOs e Linux) Se executar o Playwright resultar em um erro devido a dependências do kernel, execute o seguinte comando:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Todas as ações dos moderadores podem ser seguidas analisando os [logs de açã
|
||||
|
||||
Na primeira semana, aproximadamente, você vai querer prestar atenção ao que está sendo sinalizado e ao que está sendo analisado. Compare isso com as ações que estão sendo tomadas sobre os posts sinalizados. Você pode ver a conta do sistema sinalizar uma publicação porque o usuário a criou muito rapidamente. Em muitos casos, os moderadores desmarcarão a publicação clicando no botão "Approve post" ou a marcarão como "Not Spam" (dependendo do tipo de sinalização).
|
||||
|
||||
Comumente, sinalizações de spam também podem ser levantadas por membros ou moderadores. Comportamento comum e dúbio envolve a abertura de uma conta, criar uma publicação que parece inofensiva, editando essa postagem mais tarde para adicionar um link para um site externo com o objetivo de fazer publicidade. Nesse caso, geralmente, a conta do membro é bastante nova e só fez essa única publicação até agora, o que indica que a conta foi aberta com o único propósito de fazer spam à comunidade. A decisão a ser tomada deverá ser excluir a conta depois do primeiro delito, nesse caso. O mesmo se aplica às contas cuja primeira publicação é considerada spam.
|
||||
Comumente, sinalizações de spam também podem ser levantadas por membros ou moderadores. Common duplicitous behavior would involve opening an account, making a post that seems harmless, then editing that post later on to add a link to an external site for the purpose of advertising it. Nesse caso, geralmente, a conta do membro é bastante nova e só fez essa única publicação até agora, o que indica que a conta foi aberta com o único propósito de fazer spam à comunidade. A decisão a ser tomada deverá ser excluir a conta depois do primeiro delito, nesse caso. O mesmo se aplica às contas cuja primeira publicação é considerada spam.
|
||||
|
||||
Você pode notar que os moderadores executam um procedimento chamado 'dividir o tópico' (split topic). Esse pode ser um caso em que um moderador dividiu uma publicação que foi erroneamente feita em um tópico existente em um novo tópico, ou um moderador mesclou tópicos duplicados que um único usuário criou para a mesma pergunta. Acompanhar esse procedimento destacará as diferentes ações e suas causas.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Як додати тести Playwright
|
||||
|
||||
## Installation
|
||||
## Встановлення
|
||||
|
||||
Щоб встановити Playwright:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -20,13 +20,13 @@ pnpm run playwright:install-build-tools
|
||||
|
||||
- Файли тестів Playwright завжди мають розширення `.spec.ts`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Best Practices for writing e2e tests
|
||||
## Найкращі практики для написання тестів e2e
|
||||
|
||||
This section will explain in detail about best practices for writing and documenting E2E tests based on playwright documentation and our community code-style.
|
||||
Цей розділ детально пояснить найкращі практики написання та документування тестів E2E на основі документації Playwright та кодового стилю нашої спільноти.
|
||||
|
||||
### - Identifying a DOM element
|
||||
### - Визначення елемента DOM
|
||||
|
||||
Always use the `data-playwright-test-label` attribute to identify DOM elements. This attribute is used to identify elements in the DOM for testing with playwright only. It is not used for styling or any other purpose.
|
||||
Завжди використовуйте атрибут `data-playwright-test-label`, щоб ідентифікувати елементи DOM. Цей атрибут використовують, щоб ідентифікувати елементи в DOM лише для тестування Playwright. Його не використовують для стилізації або будь-чого іншого.
|
||||
|
||||
Наприклад:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ pnpm run playwright:install-build-tools
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Make sure you use the getByTestId method to identify the element in the test file.
|
||||
Переконайтесь, що використовуєте метод getByTestId, щоб ідентифікувати елементи в тестовому файлі.
|
||||
|
||||
Наприклад:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -44,9 +44,9 @@ pnpm run playwright:install-build-tools
|
||||
const landingPageFigure = page.getByTestId('landing-page-figure');
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### - Imports
|
||||
### - Імпорт
|
||||
|
||||
Always start with necessary imports at the beginning of the file.
|
||||
Завжди починайте необхідні імпорти на початку файлу.
|
||||
|
||||
Наприклад:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -54,22 +54,22 @@ pnpm run playwright:install-build-tools
|
||||
import { test, expect, type Page } from '@playwright/test';
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### - Constants
|
||||
### - Константи
|
||||
|
||||
Define any constant elements, data sets, or configurations used throughout your tests for easy reference.
|
||||
Визначте будь-які константні елементи, набори даних чи конфігурації, використані в тестах, для спрощеного посилання.
|
||||
|
||||
For example:
|
||||
Наприклад:
|
||||
|
||||
```ts
|
||||
const landingPageElements = { ... };
|
||||
const superBlocks = [ ... ];
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### - Shared Context
|
||||
### - Спільний контекст
|
||||
|
||||
If tests depend on a shared context (like a loaded web page), use beforeAll and afterAll hooks to set up and tear down that context.
|
||||
Якщо тести залежать від спільного контексту (наприклад, завантаженої сторінки), використайте хуки beforeAll та afterAll, щоб налаштувати та розбити контекст.
|
||||
|
||||
For example:
|
||||
Наприклад:
|
||||
|
||||
```ts
|
||||
let page: Page;
|
||||
@@ -83,11 +83,11 @@ pnpm run playwright:install-build-tools
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### - Descriptive test names
|
||||
### - Описові назви тестів
|
||||
|
||||
Each test block should have a clear and concise name describing exactly what it's testing.
|
||||
Кожен тестовий блок повинен мати чітку і лаконічну назву, описуючи саме те, що перевіряє.
|
||||
|
||||
For example:
|
||||
Наприклад:
|
||||
|
||||
```ts
|
||||
test('The component landing-top renders correctly', async ({ page }) => {
|
||||
@@ -95,21 +95,21 @@ pnpm run playwright:install-build-tools
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### - Human readable assertions
|
||||
### - Людиносприйнятні твердження
|
||||
|
||||
Each assertion should be as human readable as possible. This makes it easier to understand what the test is doing and what it's expecting.
|
||||
Кожне твердження має бути максимально розбірливим для людини. Таким чином простіше зрозуміти, що робить тест та чого очікувати.
|
||||
|
||||
For example:
|
||||
Наприклад:
|
||||
|
||||
```ts
|
||||
await expect(landingHeading1).toHaveText('Learn to code — for free.');
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### - Keep it DRY
|
||||
### - Дотримуйтесь принципу DRY
|
||||
|
||||
Make sure that the tests are not repeating the same code over and over again. If you find yourself repeating the same code, consider refactoring it as a loop or a function.
|
||||
Переконайтеся, що тести не повторюють однаковий код знову і знову. Якщо однаковий код повторюється, реорганізуйте його як цикл або функцію.
|
||||
|
||||
For example:
|
||||
Наприклад:
|
||||
|
||||
```ts
|
||||
for (const logo of await logos.all()) {
|
||||
@@ -117,11 +117,11 @@ pnpm run playwright:install-build-tools
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### - Tests for mobile screens
|
||||
### - Тести для мобільних екранів
|
||||
|
||||
Use the 'isMobile' argument to run tests that incude logic that varies for mobile screens.
|
||||
Використайте аргумент isMobile, щоб запустити тести, які містять логіку, що змінюється для мобільних екранів.
|
||||
|
||||
For example:
|
||||
Наприклад:
|
||||
|
||||
```ts
|
||||
test('The campers landing page figure is visible on desktop and hidden on mobile view', async ({isMobile}) =>
|
||||
@@ -136,11 +136,11 @@ pnpm run playwright:install-build-tools
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### - Group related tests
|
||||
### - Групові тести
|
||||
|
||||
Group related tests together using describe blocks. This makes it easier to understand what the tests are doing and what they're testing.
|
||||
Згрупуйте пов’язані тести, використовуючи описові блоки. Таким чином простіше зрозуміти, що роблять тести та чого очікувати.
|
||||
|
||||
For example:
|
||||
Наприклад:
|
||||
|
||||
```ts
|
||||
describe('The campers landing page', () => {
|
||||
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ pnpm run playwright:install-build-tools
|
||||
npx playwright test <filename>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
For example:
|
||||
Наприклад:
|
||||
|
||||
```console
|
||||
npx playwright test landing-page.spec.ts
|
||||
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ pnpm run playwright:install-build-tools
|
||||
npx playwright test <pathToFolder1> <pathToFolder2>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
For example:
|
||||
Наприклад:
|
||||
|
||||
```console
|
||||
npx playwright test tests/todo-page/ tests/landing-page/
|
||||
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ pnpm run playwright:install-build-tools
|
||||
npx playwright test -g <title>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
For example:
|
||||
Наприклад:
|
||||
|
||||
```console
|
||||
npx playwright test -g "add a todo item"
|
||||
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ npx playwright show-report
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Розв’язання проблем розробки
|
||||
|
||||
Playwright, як правило, є інструментом з дуже малим шансом на помилку. Помічник вже налаштував тести для виконання на машинах з усіма операційними системами, включно з найважливішими дистрибутивами Windows, MacOS і Linux.
|
||||
Playwright, як правило, є інструментом з дуже малим шансом на помилку. The contributor has already configured the tests to run on all OS machines, including major distributions of Windows, MacOS and Linux.
|
||||
|
||||
- (MacOs та Linux) Якщо запуск Playwright призводить до помилки через залежності ядра, запустіть цю команду:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -567,18 +567,18 @@ pnpm run update-challenge-order
|
||||
|
||||
Він проведе вас через інтерактивний процес, який допоможе впорядкувати завдання.
|
||||
|
||||
## Troubleshooting
|
||||
## Розв’язання проблем розробки
|
||||
|
||||
### Infinite Loop Detected
|
||||
### Виявлено нескінченний цикл
|
||||
|
||||
If you see the following error in the console while previewing a challenge:
|
||||
Якщо ви бачите цю помилку в консолі під час попереднього перегляду завдання:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Potential infinite loop detected on line <number>...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This means that the loop-protect plugin has found a long-running loop or recursive function. If your challenge needs to do that (e.g. it contains an event loop that is supposed to run indefinitely), then you can prevent the plugin from being used in the preview. To do so, add `disableLoopProtectPreview: true` to the block's `meta.json` file.
|
||||
Це означає, що плагін для захисту циклу знайшов довгий цикл або рекурсивну функцію. Якщо ваше завдання передбачає їх (тобто містить нескінченний цикл), ви можете запобігти використанню плагіну в попередньому перегляді. Для цього додайте `disableLoopProtectPreview: true` до файлу блоку `meta.json`.
|
||||
|
||||
If your tests are computationally intensive, then you may see this error when they run. If this happens then you can add `disableLoopProtectTests: true` to the block's `meta.json` file.
|
||||
Якщо ваші тести інтенсивно обчислюються, ви можете побачити цю помилку під час запуску. Якщо це відбувається, додайте `disableLoopProtectTests: true` до файлу блоку `meta.json`.
|
||||
|
||||
It's not typically necessary to have both set to true, so only set them as needed.
|
||||
Значенням обох необов’язково має бути true, тому налаштовуйте їх лише за потреби.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
Протягом першого тижня звертайте увагу на те, які дописи позначаються прапорцем та розглядаються, а також на застосовані до них дії. Ви можете побачити, що системний обліковий запис позначає публікацію, оскільки користувач створив її надто швидко. У багатьох випадках модератори заберуть прапорець, натиснувши кнопку «Approve Post» або позначивши допис як «Not Spam» (залежно від типу прапорця).
|
||||
|
||||
Прапорці спаму можуть використовувати користувачі та модератори. Досить часто створюють обліковий запис, пишуть допис, а потім редагують його, додаючи посилання на зовнішній сайт з метою реклами. Такий обліковий запис відносно новий та створив лише один допис, що вказує на те, що обліковий запис створили для спаму. У такому разі доцільно прийняти рішення про видалення облікового запису після першого порушення. Це також стосується облікових записів, перше повідомлення яких вважається спамом.
|
||||
Прапорці спаму можуть використовувати користувачі та модератори. Common duplicitous behavior would involve opening an account, making a post that seems harmless, then editing that post later on to add a link to an external site for the purpose of advertising it. Такий обліковий запис відносно новий та створив лише один допис, що вказує на те, що обліковий запис створили для спаму. У такому разі доцільно прийняти рішення про видалення облікового запису після першого порушення. Це також стосується облікових записів, перше повідомлення яких вважається спамом.
|
||||
|
||||
Ви можете помітити, що модератори виконують дію під назвою «розділення теми» (split topic). Це може бути випадок, коли модератор перемістив допис, який було створено у наявному дописі, у новий допис, або модератор об’єднав повторювані дописи, створені одним користувачем для того самого запитання. Подивившись на цю процедуру, можна виділити різні дії та причини.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user